Friday, April 24, 2009

Intentionality, an explanation for "determinacy"

Must consider the practical aspect of our life in the context of the world. We must find out what is it that we know of the world, then proceed to ask ontological questions. Thus, we may be able to locate ourselves within this realm.
Questions of freedom must arise at the deepest roots. It's not a choice to attend to something that got your attention. Continuance of behavior has been termed habit, but those who use methods, were pushed to do so.
If our thoughts are thoughts of something, how does one explain Regulative Cognition such as "simplicity" and "consistency." We can't perceive such tendencies as direct impressions. We got them somehow external from the world; the how is a good, simple question.

Perhaps external; maybe so external that it lead to a point of conversion, similar to the point where infinity meets nothingness, the external force of this type of cognition is fully grounded and manifested in the internal construction of us. It is also essential to our judgments about the world. Where judgments determine our view of the world. If so, our view of the world is thus determinately composed/structured in due dependence on these Regulative thoughts (thirst for simplicity and hunger for consistency), and if they are absolutely pure a priori cognition, they are fundamental to our way of life, therefore determine: the practically of our actions in every single way. Thus intentions are grounded in intentions, in intentions ans so on. The basis of this feature may have been causal. That as it may, how/where it started from one event, and transformed and configured thus forth, it still does not take away from its determinacy.

Actions are determined, for our view is determined. The judgment upon our actions are determined due to the boundaries of thought. The alteration, or the purported choice to alternate the actions are accordingly set up. The life lived, is only a life lived thus. determinacy

No comments: